- Messages
- 4,629
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Justice as United pull it back to 2-2 only to lose on penalties 12-11.
For more than a wee bit, aye.It's been this way for a bit now hasn't it?
It's not the target they necessarily wanted, but it's one they've had to settle for. At least now they can work towards selling Isak before the deadline closes.He was clearly reasonably far down the pecking order in terms of transfer targets. I've seen plenty of questions as to whether he can step up to the next level. At the same time, he's a young talent and one that apparently Bayern Munich wanted. I think they've overpaid, but the reality is they've been backed into a corner. Clearly opens the door for Isak to move to Liverpool now though.
Yep, and I'm looking forward to seeing how Woltemade actually does in the Premier League. It's a massive opportunity for him as their only out and out striker.It's not the target they necessarily wanted, but it's one they've had to settle for. At least now they can work towards selling Isak before the deadline closes.
Might be the worst VAR decision I've ever seen. And that's a high bar. As you say, they literally seemed to invent a foul. I'm not much of a fan of Danny Murphy's analysis, but as he says, they're saying he made a careless challenge (whatever that means) when he didn't actually challenge him at all. It's utterly bizarre.More VAR controversy as they invent a foul for Chelsea v Fulham before a contentious handball. Whilst I think the handball decision was correct they took a comically long time to give it.
They've just admitted the mistake and dropped the VAR official (Michael Salisbury) from Liverpool v Arsenal today.I don’t know how a bunch of trained professionals are allowed to consistently make so many mistakes in the workplace and not get moved on.
It wouldn’t fly for the rest of us, so why are the VAR officials getting away with it?
Yes, a small gesture but hopefully one that carries in to the rest of the season.They've just admitted the mistake and dropped the VAR official (Michael Salisbury) from Liverpool v Arsenal today.
But I agree, there seems to be too little consequence for repeated mistakes.
Even without the Isak signing, this has been arguably the best window Liverpool has had. Perhaps a sign of a return to glory?I'll admit that even I'm exhausted by this saga, but Newcastle did need to sign a replacement first and were going to wait until after we played each other, so a last minute deal was always more likely. Looks like Guehi is going to get done as well, in which case I can't really imagine being any happier three games in. That defensive performance against Arsenal was really unexpected, and as much as the margins are always going to be fine when you win a game with a goal like that, it gives a lot of optimism for the rest of the season.
I think it's difficult to say that until you've had the benefit of hindsight. We've had been consistently competing for the league and other cups since Klopp's third year, and would have won a few more leagues if not for City being City. Now we've won it again in Slot's first year. If City don't get back to winning ways and Arsenal don't take that next step, we could very well repeat this year and win a few over the next five years. But it's never something I'd actually expect and you take every season as it comes. It's only really after a particular for or so year stretch that you can look back and say we were dominant.Even without the Isak signing, this has been arguably the best window Liverpool has had. Perhaps a sign of a return to glory?
Completely get this view. Obviously it's a long season and it would be very unusual for a team to stay top the whole way from week 3 onwards. All teams will have dips, unusual results, and runs of good form. But can't argue with the impact that this result might have. I think it's overly simplistic to say that Arsenal fall short in the big moments and Liverpool always find a way to win, but those sorts of narratives can seep through into the players over the course of the season. It's not nothing.Yeahhh. You won twice whilst playing relatively poorly and beat us with a worldie and are already 2 points clear. As soon as the team sorts themselves out I think they seriously threaten to be unstoppable.
Also Erik Ten Hag was sacked by Leverkusen after two league games.
Yes, I think my despair with your first two wins is because we all know importance of those points. I don't think Liverpool will be in those kinds of positions much this season and for the rest of us we need you to follow through and draw (or lose).Completely get this view. Obviously it's a long season and it would be very unusual for a team to stay top the whole way from week 3 onwards. All teams will have dips, unusual results, and runs of good form. But can't argue with the impact that this result might have. I think it's overly simplistic to say that Arsenal fall short in the big moments and Liverpool always find a way to win, but those sorts of narratives can seep through into the players over the course of the season. It's not nothing.
I also don't want to make it look like I am being unreasonable pessimistic either. I was bouncing off the walls when that free kick went in yesterday, and I am still buzzing with that energy today. The optimism is real after the nervousness of the first two games. Conversely, I can imagine how gutted Arsenal fans are at this point after two excellent first games. This is a big result.
I think from what I've seen he's basically managed to fall out with the executives already.The Ten Hag thing is funny. I'd need to read more into that. Surely it's not as simple as bad form after that short a time.
Agree with all of this. In the past ten to fifteen years these games at Anfield have been open, and Arsenal have usually been outplayed. That did not happen at the weekend and Liverpool actively slowed the game down to stop Arsenal from taking control of it. That speaks to a positive change, which was also evident in your first two games with a grindy 1-0 and a much more free flowing big win after that. Unfortunately it's the nature of pundits and the news cycle that they draw conclusions from everything when it's too early to do it. The BBC had an initial reaction article after the first week, which included observations that City looked excellent and Chelsea were struggling to score. Both of those were in the bin after week 2.Yes, I think my despair with your first two wins is because we all know importance of those points. I don't think Liverpool will be in those kinds of positions much this season and for the rest of us we need you to follow through and draw (or lose).
I'm not overly disappointed with the result but I think the pundits had some ridiculous takes. Perhaps Arteta's game plan was conservative but it was probably in part influenced by the lack of Saka and Odegaard and only foiled by a moment of unpredictable brilliance, and for all of Liverpool's newly-found defensive solidity they created little themselves (it was the lowest xG aggregate in three years). I don't really think this should add to that narrative because I think there's a difference when there's a moment of magic out of nowhere rather than the last two wins where they were (slightly unfairly to say) more "regular" goals but I understand after those first two games why it has done so.
It's also because Liverpool have had a good transfer window, albeit less good with the news that the Marc Guehi transfer is off. Ekitike has made a strong start and whilst Wirtz and Kerkez have struggled a bit they will come back at their age. If Isak goes through then that's a top tier signing where unlike those other ones you are paying top dollar but for proven PL quality.
I mean, perhaps it all goes wrong? Maybe Liverpool do struggle to fix their defensive issues without strangling their attacking output. Maybe Wirtz and Kerkez never get going. Who knows?